Pages

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Don't Forget the History of Thought


It’s really important when you are working on historical fiction to keep in mind that people have not thought the same thoughts for all time.

For example, I recently watched the newest Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows and the two main characters had a conversation about Watson’s upcoming marriage and Watson stated that he wanted a “relationship.”

photo  ©2010  Doctor Who, Flickr


I paused at that small statement because I don’t think the concept of “a relationship” as we know it today was around in London 1800s. Marriages were marriages, not a partnership or a “relationship.” They were made for monetary reasons, for survival reasons, occasionally for affectionate reasons. In the past, people didn’t think of love the way we do now. Life wasn’t all about finding one’s true love. Love was something that grew with time if you were lucky after marrying someone for survival reasons.

Now, first thing, let me point out that I’m not dissing Sherlock Holmes. I love those movies and really those movies are commercial and blockbuster so that level of historical fine tuning isn’t what that general audience wants from those movies. I’m just using that as an example because I watched over the weekend.

Finding happiness . . . also, a concept that has changed over time. For many historical people, like in the dark ages, happiness as the final outcome of their lives—ha! I’d venture to even say that is a very American concept created from: “. . . Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness . . .” not to mention fairy tales. Remember original fairy tales did not have happy endings—usually they were kind of gory.

Politics, freedom, war, political correctness, religion, the beyond, heaven, survival, the life span, birth, sex, contraception, medicine, illness, the mind, and I could go on and on about areas of thought that would have been different at different times in history.

 Vintage Irish military photograph of the attack on the Lusitania, surrounded by bodies of victims with text reading "Irishmen avenge the Lusitania. Join an Irish Regiment Today." 


Well, we as writers or even historians can’t possibly know what people thought in history. Sure we have diaries and a couple other musings of historical minds but that doesn’t mean we can know everything that was in their heads! No, but we do know a lot from diaries and other sources and a lot of this stuff can be figured out if you put a little of your modern thought into it.

The idea of flying saucers and little green men were obviously inconceivable to people in the 1700s before there were airplanes.  The idea of slavery was not considered immoral for thousands of years, long before the Americas.

The areas that will take a little more energy are things that are not as well known and those are the areas that will interest readers those most. Keep in mind your readers would rather be wrapped up in a semi-inaccurate story than go “huh?” to strange facts but by taking historical thought into consideration, you will create a much more vivid and interesting historical world and story.

How do you do that? Just start thinking about it, keeping it in mind when you are researching and writing. Look for overly modern concepts while editing. Do a focused research session on your time period taking thought into consideration. Try to get into your characters heads and of course read up on the history of thought. Yeah, I’m not just making this crap up – it’s an area of professional historical study. I’ve got some resources below.

Leave a Comment: What are some examples of times you are writing and have had to consider historical thought that might seem strange or unbelievable to the way we think today?



Some interesting references:


Freud and Beyond: A History of Modern Psychoanalytic Thought by Stephen A. Mitchell & M. J. Black
A History of Freedom of Thought by J. B. Bury and H. J. Blackham 
A History of Western Political Thought by J. S. McClelland and Dr J S Mcclelland

Check them out at Amazon.

4 comments:

  1. I found this post very interesting, but actually I'm responding to your question on the FB Writing Fiction group (I dropped out of that group because I sensed Ainsley and I weren't seeing eye-to-eye.) Your question was in regard to my post on my blog of Ch. 22 of my novel. I posted that chapter on the Ruminations of a Remembrancer blog because I wanted to include something in the 3rd Sunday Blog Carnival and this chapter is pretty "stand alone." But when I started this indie publishing business, I was instructed that publishing sample chapters of one's book on one's blog was a must. So I did that on http://termitewriter.blogspot.com for the first 14 chapters of "Termite Queen," and the first few chapters of "Stolen Mother" on my other blog, http://termitespeaker.blogspot.com Frankly I've been thinking that I'm not sure it's done a lot of good. My books tend to be a little slow out of the starting gate so I'm not sure publishing the early chapters helped sales that much. And people can get sample downloads on Smashwords.
    I like your blog - I'll see if I can follow it. I'll also look for you on Twitter. I'm @TermiteWriter

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for sharing Lorinda. That's very interesting and good to know how you think it's doing. I'll check out your blog and look for you on Twitter. Thanks for commenting. =)

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's true that the practice of slavery was wide spread in the ancient world and that very few people questioned the institution, however you do sometimes see discussions of it. The Stoic Philosopher Blossius of Cumae, who lived during the second century BC was said to have planned to found Heliopolis, a city without slaves. Plutarch criticizes Cato the Elder for his ill-treatment of his slaves, implying that he, himslelf, would no more sell off an elderly slave than he would an elderly dog. In my Historical novel The Death of Carthage, one of my characters is distinctly opposed to slavery, but this person was born a slave as his father had been captured in war. However I make it clear that this person's opinion is unique:"Whenever I hold forth on the subject I'm met with incredulous looks and glassy-eyed stares, so I generally only do that when I've had more wine than I should."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for your comment Robin, it is so very interesting when you find historical documents where people have a very modern opinion - it's one of those things I call gems. I checked out your book on www.goodreads.com and it looks very interesting. Put that on my to-read list. Thanks again for sharing.

    ReplyDelete